Reviewers Invitation for Annals of Operations Research - 艾思科蓝

您当前浏览器版本过低，为了不影响您的使用，建议您使用最新的谷歌浏览器、火狐浏览器、 360浏览器，更换浏览器后使用更流畅！（注意！双核浏览器请切换为极速模式）

400-607-9388

任务指引

任务信息

Reviewers Invitation for Annals of Operations Research

发布时间：2022-02-09

管理学英文

下载任务资料已结束领取任务已申请已领取

任务内容

We are looking for reviewers for Annals of Operations Research. Potential topics include but are not limited to the following:

We are only looking for reviewers from different countries than the authors(China).

根据Annals of Operations Research期刊要求，审稿人与作者（中国）需属于不同国籍，故不接受中国籍审稿人，请悉知。

Prescriptive analytics application to large-scale problems

Application of prescriptive analytics to decision-making processes

The relationships between prescriptive analytics and machine learning

A review of the static prescriptive analytics models

The relationships between prescriptive analytics and data mining methods

The relationships between prescriptive analytics and artificial intelligence

The relationships between prescriptive analytics and constraint programming

Dynamic prescriptive analytics models

Prescriptive analytics to the recommendation-based business models

Prescriptive analytics via mathematical programming

Prescriptive analytics using mathematical optimization

Stochastic-process models and prescriptive analytics

Prescriptive analytics using Markov decision processes

Inventory control and prescriptive analytics

Graph theory and prescriptive analytics

Prescriptive analytics using discrete optimization

Prescriptive analytics using fuzzy sets theory

Prescriptive analytics models for forecasting and optimization

Prescriptive trees models

Prescriptive scenario for stochastic optimization

Prescriptive divergence

Predictive analytics models

Descriptive analytics models

Simulation and prescriptive analytics

Prescriptive analytics and artificial intelligence

If you are interested in the above subjects, you are welcomed to join us as a reviewer. The requirements for the reviewers are as follows:

1) Candidates will be invited by journal editors for peer review and provide their comments in English.

2) All reviewers are expected to complete their review within 10 days.

3) The reviewer’s comments should include both the overall evaluation (eg. significance, novelty, highlights, defects) and the specific suggestions (at least 5 points).

After AIS confirms your application, please kindly send your name, affiliation, and affiliation e-mail to the email in the attachment.

交通运输工程

【Committee Invitation】2025 International Conference on Unmanned System and Technology

计算机科学与技术

【Committee Invitation】2025 International Conference on Astronomy and Optical Measurement (AOM 2025)

天文学

【Committee Invitation】2025 2nd International Conference on Remote Sensing Technology and Survey Mapping

测绘科学

【Committee Invitation】2025 5th International Conference on Smart City Engineering and Public Transportation

交通运输工程

【Committee Invitation】2025 2nd International Conference on Urban Construction and Transportation (UCT 2025)

交通运输工程

课题资源开发——导师招募

计算机科学与技术

您还未认证成为智库专家

认证通过后即可领取任务

去认证

是否确认领取该任务

在您仔细阅读任务详情后，接受本任务

确认

取消

领取成功

领取成功后，平台确认即可进行该任务

确认

查看我的任务

是否确认领取该任务

同行预审任务须知

请客观公正评审，并认真完成《专家分析评估报告》（以下简称：报告），系统将根据评分及完成时效等综合情况验收并核定相关报酬和奖励。感谢配合。

1.报告评分

编辑对评析的专业内容从完整性和参考价值两方面来评价报告的实用性评分，无专业性内容的报告会被否决，任务终止。

1.1完整性【5分】

【Ⅰ】0.2分/项，次要评析内容，共8项；

【Ⅱ】0.4分/项，重要评析内容，共3项；

【Ⅲ】0.8分/项，重要评析内容，共3项，需从写作逻辑结构和研究主题两方面对文章进行评析，体现专业度，如果只评析了一个方面仅得0.4分/项。

1.2参考价值【5分】

需在相关部分对文章的写作逻辑结构、研究主题和其他问题3项内容提出修改建议，体现专业度，修改建议分为笼统、清晰及详细3个等级，分别对应为0、1及2分。

2. 完成期限

7天内返回该报告。必要时，须在时限内联系编辑申请延期，无故延期或超期限完成，任务都可能被终止。

3. 其他

专家也可用个人习惯的评审方式来评析文章（如，在原文批注等），但须包含报告所涉及的各方面内容，完成后，请打包压缩所有相关文件，上传至艾思科蓝系统。

报告总评分低于6分时，编辑可能提出返修，返修1次后仍未能达到要求，报告将被否决，任务终止。任务在验收前被终止的，没有任何报酬或奖励

Instructions for Reviewers

Please review the manuscript objectively, and carefully complete the report. The report will be assessed and remuneration will be provided based on the result of assessment. Thank you for your cooperation.

1.Evaluation

The report will be evaluated by its integrity and reference value. Should no professional guidance be provided in the report, the report will be rejected and the task will be terminated

1.1 Integrity [5 points]

[Ⅰ]. 0.2 point / item (8 items in total), items of secondary importance;

[Ⅱ]. 0.4 point / item (3 items in total), items of primary importance;

[Ⅲ]. 0.8 point / item (3 items in total), items of primary importance; assessment and comments on these items need to be made from two aspects: the logical flow in writing and the research topic, and only 0.4 point will be given if either aspect is not evaluated.

1.2 Reference value [5 points]

You need to provide professional modification suggestions based on the logical flow in writing, research topic and other issues regarding the manuscript. Modification suggestions are divided into three levels: general, clear, and detailed, which deserve 0, 1, and 2 points, respectively.

2. Task turnaround

You need to return the completed report within 7 days. If necessary, contact the editor to apply for an extension of the deadline. For any breach of the agreed deadline in other cases, the task will be terminated and no remuneration for the task in question will be provided

3. Miscellaneous

You are free to review manuscripts by your personal habits (e. g., making revisions or leaving comments in the original text), but the evaluation needs to cover all items listed in the report. After completion, please compress all relevant documents and upload the compressed file (zip./rar.) to the AIS system

Instruction to Editors

1.Evaluation Indicators

It is a pleasure to work with you on this project. Your returned manuscript will be assessed from the four dimensions listed below. One star is assigned to each dimension. If the requirements in the dimension are met, one star will be given. Experts winning more stars for a project are likely to have a rise in remuneration and more chances for future collaborations.

Star	Evaluation Dimension	Specific requirements
	Grammar, punctuation, style, and format	Correct all errors in grammar and punctuation. Correct errors in numbering of section titles, tables, figures, equations, formulae, etc.
	Technical accuracy	Correct errors in terminology and technical presentation; ensure technical consistency. Provide acronyms of terminologies at first mention when necessary, and ensure consistency in the use of acronyms.
	Presentation and logic improvement	Improve wording and phrasing to improve readability; Restructure sentences, provide necessary conjunctions, and adjust the order of paragraphs to improve the logical flow.
	Content-related comments	Pinpoint problems in the research content, presentation, theoretical framework, and other content-related issues, and provide suggestions for improvement; Provide comments to ambiguous expression.
	Cooperation	Provide timely response to inquiries from our in-house editors or authors; Provide on-going support for revision.

2.On-time delivery

We are committed to 100% on-time delivery of work to our authors. Please carefully read the Project Overview and Details, especially the "deadline" and "remuneration", to check whether you are available for the project before you click "accept". If you need an extension of the deadline, please inform us by mail, WeChat, or other contacts available at least one working day in advance to reset the deadline. Any breach of the agreed deadline in other cases is likely to incur deduction in remuneration.

3.Policy concerning the use of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies

Given concerns for academic integrity and transparency of publishing, we do not encourage our editors to use generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in editing projects. These technologies can be used for grammar, spelling checks, reference editing or management. Editors who use these technologies in editing projects should carefully check the content generated or edited by generative AI and AI-assisted tools to ensure that the content is verifiable, accurate, and remains true to the author’s intended meaning; the completed project should be within the acceptable range of AI rate required by the publishing house. Editors should avoid excessive use of AI tools that may cause complaints from authors, or revision or rejection decisions from publishing houses.

论文翻译任务须知

1.翻译质量与配合度评估

本任务将按如下指标进行评估验收。每个评估指标占一颗星，满足该项指标得一颗星，未满足则该项不得星。任务所得星数越高，成为优质专家的几率越大。优质专家将有机会获得更高的稿酬与更高的派稿频率。

指标	详情	具体指标
语言质量	评估终稿1）是否随意增译漏译；2）是否有严重机翻；3）是否有语法、大小写、标点等问题、4）行文是否流畅。	无随意增译漏译、机翻问题无基础语法问题，无主语缺失句无大小写、标点、空格问题单位与公式变量的上下标和正斜体语原文一致根据实际情况合理断句、调整句型结构、句段顺序、适当意译，保证行文流畅，逻辑清晰
术语准确性	评估终稿中术语是否准确、是否全文一致	术语准确且前后文一致
文风、格式	评估终稿是否符合科技论文格式与文风	根据实际情况调整文内引用格式，根据参考文献列表核对文内引用纠正标题、图、表序号错误了解并严格遵循术语的缩写规则，能在首次提及时，提供专业缩写的全称，之后延用缩写文风严谨，符合科技论文特点，不出现流水句、口语化特征明显的句子
专业意见	评估专家是否提供专业内容上、论文框架等提供意见	能指出论文专业内容或框架等方面的缺陷，并提供建议
配合度	评估专家是否在稿件存在问题时，积极回应，是否配合返修	能回应作者或质检编辑提出的问题能积极配合返修

2.反馈及时度评估

上述指标主要用于评估稿件质量与专家配合度。时效性为额外的评估维度。专家需按照任务详情页的“截止日期/deadline”，及时反馈稿件。因特殊原因无法及时反馈的，需至少提前1个工作日告知编辑（联系方式在任务详情页），申请延期。无故延期或超期限完成，且未告知编辑的，对应任务可能将被终止。

3.生成式AI与AI辅助技术的使用

出于学术诚信与出版透明的考虑，我们不鼓励专家在处理稿件时过度依赖生成式AI或AI辅助技术。专家可以使用AI工具可以用于语法、拼写检查、文献管理和编辑。专家在使用AI工具协助处理稿件时，必须对AI生成或编辑的内容进行检查，确保所生成的内容真实、准确、不偏离作者原意、并将AI率控制在出版社能接受的范围内。专家应尽量避免因使用AI工具造成作者投诉、出版社返修、拒稿等，减少返修或任务终止的情况。

校对任务

1.稿件质量评估

本任务将按如下指标进行评估验收。每个评估指标占一颗星，满足该项指标得一颗星，未满足则该项不得星。任务所得星数越高，成为优质专家的几率越大。优质专家将有机会获得更高稿酬的合作机会与更高的派稿频率。

星级	维度	具体指标
	拼写、冠词、标点、空格、基础语法	纠正了所有的拼写、单词层面的错误纠正了所有标点、空格错误修正了基础语法问题
	论文格式	校正了文内引用格式、专业缩写、参考文献等问题
	悬挂句、祈使句、句意不清等	修正了悬挂句、无主语句、句意不清等问题
	重复内容、逻辑修正	删除了重复的单词、句段；改善了句段逻辑，对缺失成分的句子进行了批注
	配合度	能回应作者或质检编辑提出的问题；能积极配合返修

2.反馈及时度评估

3.生成式AI与AI辅助技术的使用

我们的服务