It is a pleasure to work with you on this project. Your returned manuscript will be assessed from the four dimensions listed below. One star is assigned to each dimension. If the requirements in the dimension are met, one star will be given. Experts winning more stars for a project are likely to have a rise in remuneration and more chances for future collaborations.

Star	Evaluation Dimension	Specific requirements
	Grammar, punctuation, style, and format	Correct all errors in grammar and punctuation. Correct errors in numbering of section titles, tables, figures, equations, formulae, etc.
	Technical accuracy	Correct errors in terminology and technical presentation; ensure technical consistency. Provide acronyms of terminologies at first mention when necessary, and ensure consistency in the use of acronyms.
	Presentation and logic improvement	Improve wording and phrasing to improve readability; Restructure sentences, provide necessary conjunctions, and adjust the order of paragraphs to improve the logical flow.
	Content-related comments	Pinpoint problems in the research content, presentation, theoretical framework, and other content-related issues, and provide suggestions for improvement; Provide comments to ambiguous expression.
	Cooperation	Provide timely response to inquiries from our in-house editors or authors; Provide on-going support for revision.

We are committed to 100% on-time delivery of work to our authors. Please carefully read the Project Overview and Details, especially the "deadline" and "remuneration", to check whether you are available for the project before you click "accept". If you need an extension of the deadline, please inform us by mail, WeChat, or other contacts available at least one working day in advance to reset the deadline. Any breach of the agreed deadline in other cases is likely to incur deduction in remuneration.

Given concerns for academic integrity and transparency of publishing, we do not encourage our editors to use generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in editing projects. These technologies can be used for grammar, spelling checks, reference editing or management. Editors who use these technologies in editing projects should carefully check the content generated or edited by generative AI and AI-assisted tools to ensure that the content is verifiable, accurate, and remains true to the author’s intended meaning; the completed project should be within the acceptable range of AI rate required by the publishing house. Editors should avoid excessive use of AI tools that may cause complaints from authors, or revision or rejection decisions from publishing houses.