您当前浏览器版本过低,为了不影响您的使用,建议您使用最新的谷歌浏览器、火狐浏览器、 360浏览器,更换浏览器后使用更流畅!(注意!双核浏览器请切换为极速模式)
400-607-9388
任务指引
任务信息
Recruitment of Psychology experts for the revision of SCI thesis. 招募心理学专家进行论文个性化修改
发布时间:2021-09-03
心理学 英文
下载任务资料 已结束 领取任务 已申请 已领取
任务内容

[Psychology] Recruitment of experts for the revision of SCI thesis.

Ais Editor is now recruiting experts in related fields to revise submitted SCI thesis. Experts can make professional modifications according to the target journal, so as to improve the quality of thesis and ensure smooth publication. You will also be well paid.

 We need you:

1. Ph.D. or above (or excellent Ph.D. students).

2. In-depth research on Psychology.

2. Experience in publishing, reviewing and editing SCI.

 

Paper information:

Topic: The research method was a cross-sectional research method. The convenience sampling method was adopted to select 156 first-line medical staff during the period of the COVID-19. Depression, anxiety, and stress among front-line medical staff in terms of gender, education level, professional title status, children's status, and working years are deeply investigated.

Key words: COVID-19; medical staff; mental state 

Target Journal: Four-zone journals (a more suitable journal for the author can also be recommended).

Objective: Improve the quality of thesis to publish successfully.

Tasks

(1)Deep modification

(2)Guidance and opinions on experimental design

(3)Improve the language of the manuscript

(4)Restructure sentences or paragraphs

(5)Help reply to review comments

(6)Remodification

*The revised results will be verified by senior journal editors and must meet the quality requirements of SCI

 Compensation for tasks:

It is well paid separately in twice. Details can be discussed with the task publisher.

Payment

The   first payment

The   second payment


The   thesis is under review

The   thesis is approved

Time: After signing an agreement, the initial revision should be completed within 20 days.

 After you sign up, the task publisher will communicate with you further.


心理学】SCI论文个性化修改 专家招募

 艾思编译为我们平台的SCI投稿论文提供个性化修改服务。现招募相关领域的专家,针对作者稿件与投稿目标提供专业的润色修改,以提升论文质量,保障顺利投稿发表。

我们需要这样的您:

1.博士或以上学历(优秀在读博士亦可)。

2.对心理学有深入的研究。
2.具有SCI写作与发表经验,如有SCI审稿和编辑经验更好。

稿件信息:

主题: 采用横断法,以新冠肺炎防控期间的156名一线医务人员为研究对象,采用在线调查表单,从性别、文化程度、职称状况、子女状况、工作年限五个维度调查一线医务人员的抑郁、焦虑、压力总体状况。

关键词:新冠肺炎;医务人员;心理状态

投稿目标:四区SCI,可根据稿件情况推荐作者更合适的期刊

 任务目标:根据发表需求,通过编辑润色为论文提高质量,以助力完成发表。

负责内容

(1)全程深度修改

(2)实验设计指导意见

(3)语言润色与表述规范化

(4)行文逻辑与结构调整

(5)协助回复审稿意见

(6)协助处理返修

*修改结果将由资深期刊编辑校验,需确实进行到符合SCI质量的编辑修改*

任务报酬:报酬丰厚,分多次发放,详情可与任务发布老师洽谈。

付费节点

第一次付费

第二次付费


稿件进审

稿件被录用(收到录用通知)

时间要求:在签订合作协议后,初次修改在20天内完成并返稿。

 任务接取方式:招标任务向所有专家开放,将根据领取先后和匹配程度选择中标者。

 具体详情在您报名接取后,任务发布老师会与您进行进一步沟通。

 


认证专家
您还未认证成为智库专家
认证通过后即可领取任务
是否确认领取该任务
在您仔细阅读任务详情后,接受本任务
确认
取消
领取任务
领取成功
领取成功后,平台确认即可进行该任务
确认
是否确认领取该任务

同行预审任务须知

请客观公正评审,并认真完成《专家分析评估报告》(以下简称:报告),系统将根据评分及完成时效等综合情况验收并核定相关报酬和奖励。感谢配合。
1.报告评分

编辑对评析的专业内容从完整性参考价值两方面来评价报告的实用性评分,无专业性内容的报告会被否决,任务终止。

1.1完整性【5分】

【Ⅰ】0.2分/项,次要评析内容,共8项;

【Ⅱ】0.4分/项,重要评析内容,共3项;

【Ⅲ】0.8分/项,重要评析内容,共3项,需从写作逻辑结构研究主题两方面对文章进行评析,体现专业度,如果只评析了一个方面仅得0.4分/项。

1.2参考价值【5分】

需在相关部分对文章的写作逻辑结构研究主题其他问题3项内容提出修改建议,体现专业度,修改建议分为笼统清晰详细3个等级,分别对应为0、1及2分。

2. 完成期限

7天内返回该报告。必要时,须在时限内联系编辑申请延期,无故延期或超期限完成,任务都可能被终止。

3. 其他

专家也可用个人习惯的评审方式来评析文章(如,在原文批注等),但须包含报告所涉及的各方面内容,完成后,请打包压缩所有相关文件,上传至艾思科蓝系统。

报告总评分低于6分时,编辑可能提出返修,返修1次后仍未能达到要求,报告将被否决,任务终止。任务在验收前被终止的,没有任何报酬或奖励

Instructions for Reviewers

Please review the manuscript objectively, and carefully complete the report. The report will be assessed and remuneration will be provided based on the result of assessment. Thank you for your cooperation.
1.Evaluation

The report will be evaluated by its integrity and reference value. Should no professional guidance be provided in the report, the report will be rejected and the task will be terminated

1.1 Integrity [5 points]

[Ⅰ]. 0.2 point / item (8 items in total), items of secondary importance;

[Ⅱ]. 0.4 point / item (3 items in total), items of primary importance;

[Ⅲ]. 0.8 point / item (3 items in total), items of primary importance; assessment and comments on these items need to be made from two aspects: the logical flow in writing and the research topic, and only 0.4 point will be given if either aspect is not evaluated.

1.2 Reference value [5 points]

You need to provide professional modification suggestions based on the logical flow in writing, research topic and other issues regarding the manuscript. Modification suggestions are divided into three levels: general, clear, and detailed, which deserve 0, 1, and 2 points, respectively.

2. Task turnaround

You need to return the completed report within 7 days. If necessary, contact the editor to apply for an extension of the deadline. For any breach of the agreed deadline in other cases, the task will be terminated and no remuneration for the task in question will be provided

3. Miscellaneous

You are free to review manuscripts by your personal habits (e. g., making revisions or leaving comments in the original text), but the evaluation needs to cover all items listed in the report. After completion, please compress all relevant documents and upload the compressed file (zip./rar.) to the AIS system

Instruction to Editors

1.Evaluation Indicators

It is a pleasure to work with you on this project. Your returned manuscript will be assessed from the four dimensions listed below. One star is assigned to each dimension. If the requirements in the dimension are met, one star will be given. Experts winning more stars for a project are likely to have a rise in remuneration and more chances for future collaborations.

Star Evaluation Dimension Specific requirements
Grammar, punctuation, style, and format
  • Correct all errors in grammar and punctuation.
  • Correct errors in numbering of section titles, tables, figures, equations, formulae, etc.
Technical accuracy
  • Correct errors in terminology and technical presentation; ensure technical consistency.
  • Provide acronyms of terminologies at first mention when necessary, and ensure consistency in the use of acronyms.
Presentation and logic improvement Improve wording and phrasing to improve readability;
Restructure sentences, provide necessary conjunctions, and adjust the order of paragraphs to improve the logical flow.
Content-related comments
  • Pinpoint problems in the research content, presentation, theoretical framework, and other content-related issues, and provide suggestions for improvement;
  • Provide comments to ambiguous expression.
Cooperation Provide timely response to inquiries from our in-house editors or authors;
Provide on-going support for revision.
2.On-time delivery

We are committed to 100% on-time delivery of work to our authors. Please carefully read the Project Overview and Details, especially the "deadline" and "remuneration", to check whether you are available for the project before you click "accept". If you need an extension of the deadline, please inform us by mail, WeChat, or other contacts available at least one working day in advance to reset the deadline. Any breach of the agreed deadline in other cases is likely to incur deduction in remuneration.

论文翻译任务须知

1.翻译质量与配合度评估

本任务将按如下指标进行评估验收。每个评估指标占一颗星,满足该项指标得一颗星,未满足则该项不得星。任务所得星数越高,成为优质专家的几率越大。优质专家将有机会获得更高的稿酬与更高的派稿频率。

星级 指标 详情 具体指标
语言质量 评估终稿1)是否随意增译漏译;2)是否有严重机翻;3)是否有语法、大小写、标点等问题、4)行文是否流畅。
  • 无随意增译漏译、机翻问题
  • 无基础语法问题,无主语缺失句
  • 无大小写、标点、空格问题
  • 单位与公式变量的上下标和正斜体语原文一致
  • 根据实际情况合理断句、调整句型结构、句段顺序、适当意译,保证行文流畅,逻辑清晰
术语准确性 评估终稿中术语是否准确、是否全文一致
  • 术语准确且前后文一致
文风、格式 评估终稿是否符合科技论文格式与文风
  • 根据实际情况调整文内引用格式,
  • 根据参考文献列表核对文内引用
  • 纠正标题、图、表序号错误
  • 了解并严格遵循术语的缩写规则,能在首次提及时,提供专业缩写的全称,之后延用缩写
  • 文风严谨,符合科技论文特点,不出现流水句、口语化特征明显的句子
专业意见 评估专家是否提供专业内容上、论文框架等提供意见 能指出论文专业内容或框架等方面的缺陷,并提供建议
配合度 评估专家是否在稿件存在问题时,积极回应,是否配合返修
  • 能回应作者或质检编辑提出的问题
  • 能积极配合返修
2.反馈及时度评估

上述指标主要用于评估稿件质量与专家配合度。时效性为额外的评估维度。专家需按照任务详情页的“截止日期/deadline”,及时反馈稿件。因特殊原因无法及时反馈的,需至少提前1个工作日告知编辑(联系方式在任务详情页),申请延期。无故延期或超期限完成,且未告知编辑的,对应任务可能将被终止。

校对任务

1.稿件质量评估

本任务将按如下指标进行评估验收。每个评估指标占一颗星,满足该项指标得一颗星,未满足则该项不得星。任务所得星数越高,成为优质专家的几率越大。优质专家将有机会获得更高稿酬的合作机会与更高的派稿频率。

星级 维度 具体指标
拼写、冠词、标点、空格、基础语法
  • 纠正了所有的拼写、单词层面的错误
  • 纠正了所有标点、空格错误
  • 修正了基础语法问题
论文格式 校正了文内引用格式、专业缩写、参考文献等问题
悬挂句、祈使句、句意不清等 修正了悬挂句、无主语句、句意不清等问题
重复内容、逻辑修正 删除了重复的单词、句段;改善了句段逻辑,对缺失成分的句子进行了批注
配合度 能回应作者或质检编辑提出的问题;能积极配合返修
2.反馈及时度评估

上述指标主要用于评估稿件质量与专家配合度。时效性为额外的评估维度。专家需按照任务详情页的“截止日期/deadline”,及时反馈稿件。因特殊原因无法及时反馈的,需至少提前1个工作日告知编辑(联系方式在任务详情页),申请延期。无故延期或超期限完成,且未告知编辑的,对应任务可能将被终止。